Imagine asking your AI assistant for the best lasagna recipe and receiving a mouth-watering Italian classic, only to ask the same question tomorrow and get a vegan twist you didn't expect. Frustrating? Absolutely. Welcome to the enigmatic world of Large Language Models (LLMs), where consistency can sometimes feel like a fleeting dream.
Traditional software is deterministic: the same inputs will result in the same output. When you integrate AI into traditional software, your users may be very confused by the variation in results. In fact, they may interpret variable results as errors in your software. Fortunately, there are tricks for constraining this issue as we discuss below.
Let's put on our detective hats and unravel why these inconsistencies occur.
LLMs are not static entities; they're often updated to improve performance, incorporate new data, or fix issues. Each update can subtly—or not so subtly—alter how the model processes prompts. For some questions, using an LLM may be like querying the classic magic eight ball—you get different answers each time.
The data an LLM is trained on forms its understanding of the world. As this data changes—whether through additions, deletions, or modifications—the model's outputs can vary. This is known as data drift. The same thing happens when I write blog posts like this. I write a draft, do a little more research, and then update the draft the next day.
LLMs generate text by predicting the next word in a sequence based on probabilities. This process inherently involves randomness, especially when the model is designed to produce creative or varied outputs. For example, asking an AI to "Tell me a joke" might yield different jokes each time due to the randomness in word selection.
Parameters like temperature and top_p control the randomness and creativity of the AI's output. Higher settings encourage diversity, while lower settings promote consistency.
LLMs consider the context in which a prompt is given. Slight changes in preceding text or conversation history can influence the output. Asking a chatbot "What's the weather like?" after discussing vacations might yield different results than after discussing climate change.
Now that we've diagnosed the problem, let's explore remedies.
Choosing a model that is specifically designed for consistency or tailored for a particular task can significantly mitigate variability. Specialized models often have narrower focus areas and are trained to perform consistently within those domains.
Action Step: Evaluate different models and select one that aligns closely with your application's requirements.
Reducing the temperature parameter makes the model's output more deterministic. It's akin to narrowing the AI's creative freedom to ensure it sticks to the script. Set the temperature parameter to a low value (e.g., 0.2) when consistency is paramount.
Action Step: Adjust the temperature setting in your API calls to control the randomness of the output.
Switching to deterministic decoding methods like greedy sampling or beam search can eliminate randomness. You’ll have to use these methods in your API calls to the LLM.
Action Step: Implement these decoding strategies in your application to produce more consistent results.
Clear, specific prompts reduce ambiguity and guide the AI toward the desired output. Vague prompts will result in more randomness, while more detailed prompts will result in more consistency. If you’re building software, you can use interfaces, such as picklists, to ensure more consistent input and therefore more consistent output.
Action Step: Refine your prompts to be as specific as possible and consider using structured input methods.
Combining the outputs of multiple models can reduce variability and improve accuracy. Ensemble methods leverage the strengths of different models, balancing out individual quirks.
Action Step: Use ensemble techniques like averaging outputs or majority voting to aggregate responses from multiple models.
Using techniques like filtering, ranking, or re-ranking can help refine and improve the quality of LLM outputs. This acts as a secondary check to ensure the output meets your criteria.
Action Step: Implement post-processing steps to analyze and adjust the AI's responses before presenting them to users.
Creating a fine-tuned model trained on your own data can increase the consistency of outputs. By tailoring the model to your specific domain or use case, you can align its behavior more closely with your expectations. One approach is to constrain the range of acceptable outputs.
Action Step: Fine-tune the LLM using your proprietary data to enhance its performance in targeted areas.
By sticking with a specific model version, you prevent unexpected changes due to updates. Because learned knowledge can evolve based on feedback, you might even consider refreshing the model each day so there is no “knowledge shift” based on the prior day’s learnings. Refreshing the model is easier using tools like containers in Kubernetes that are designed for this sort of thing.
Action Step: Use versioned APIs and document the model version in use to maintain consistency.
This may sound like throwing in the towel, but you can also work on user messaging to convey the randomness of AI models. This clearly won’t work in all situations, but transparency about the AI's capabilities and limitations can mitigate user frustration.
Action Step: Communicate to users that slight variations are normal and explain why they occur.
Achieving perfect consistency in LLM outputs is challenging due to the very nature of how these models work. However, by understanding the underlying factors and implementing strategic adjustments, software developers can significantly enhance output reliability. Remember, it's about finding the right balance between consistency and the dynamic capabilities that make LLMs powerful.
Q1: Can I completely eliminate randomness in LLM outputs?
A: While you can minimize randomness by adjusting parameters and using deterministic methods (formulas, guardrails, picklists, etc.), some level of variability may still exist due to the model's design.
Q2: Why did the AI's response change after an update even though I used the same prompt?
A: Model updates can alter how the AI processes inputs, leading to different outputs. Using a fixed model version can help maintain consistency.
Q3: Is it better to use a lower temperature for all AI applications?
A: Not necessarily. Lower temperatures improve consistency but can make outputs less creative. Choose the temperature based on your application's needs.
Struggling with inconsistent AI outputs in your software? Contact us today to learn how we can help you harness the power of LLMs with reliability and consistency.
Subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest updates and promotions from MPH straight to your inbox.
