Tech's Ruthless Playbook in Stablecoins: Crushing Margins to Own the Market

|

Updated on September 15, 2025

Picking up from where we left off, it's clear that tech's dominance in stablecoins isn't just about innovation—it's a brutal, calculated assault on margins in a winner-takes-most arena. In traditional banking, steady profits from deposits keep the lights on. But tech? They're wired differently. These giants—think Circle with USDC or Tether's empire—operate in a world where network effects turn the game into a zero-sum bloodbath: you're #1, a distant #2 scraping by, or roadkill. They'll slash yields, subsidize fees, and even lose money short-term to amass users, liquidity, and integrations that create impenetrable moats. Why? Because once the flywheel spins—more holders mean more merchants, more DeFi liquidity, more everything—the value compounds exponentially, leaving competitors gasping. As we've seen with platforms like Ethereum dominating stablecoin transactions (handling half of all volume with $140.5 billion parked), the spoils go to the issuers who capture issuance and distribution edges, where regulatory moats and ecosystem lock-in matter most. Stablecoin issuance has morphed into a lucrative winner-takes-all model, with Tether and Circle raking in billions by prioritizing scale over immediate payouts. Banks lobbying for tweaks? Cute, but futile. Tech will crush their own margins to win the trillions, because in this space, second place is the first loser.

The Winner-Takes-Most Mindset: Why Tech Will Bleed to Lead

Tech firms aren't in stablecoins for quick bucks; they're playing the long game in a market projected to hit $3.7 trillion by 2030. In this arena, network effects are king—each new user boosts value for everyone, creating a snowball that buries rivals. We've already witnessed it: USDC's growth outpacing competitors through partnerships and supply expansion, or Tether's organic, sometimes shady channels building unmatched liquidity. They'll undercut yields to zero if needed, subsidizing ecosystems to hook users early. Why bleed margins? Because the endgame is monopoly-like dominance. Morningstar nails it: network effects widen moats, turning advantages into fortresses. In crypto, these effects aren't just nice-to-have; they're the ultimate economic moat, propelling protocols while shielding them from copycats. Stripe sees USDC as "special" in a winner-takes-most race, and they're right—tech will burn cash on distribution and compliance to own the rails, leaving smaller issuers or banks scrambling for scraps.

Circumventing Constraints: Running Around Regulation

With the GENIUS Act clamping down on direct interest or yields to holders, you'd think tech is handcuffed. Think again. Tech companies not only run around regulation, they do it with glee. In some cases regulatory arbitrage is their core model. Examples include ridesharing (Uber, Lyft, etc.) which arbitraged taxi medallions, and home rentals (AirBNB, VRBO, etc.) who arbitraged hotel taxes. There is so much money in stablecoins, they literally print money, so they will at a minimum evade regulation but might also engage in regulatory arbitrage; undercutting the banks who follow the rules.  

Tech companies will exploit every loophole, routing value through indirect channels that build market share without overtly breaking the rules. Issuers keep interest from reserves in-house, prioritizing stability over payouts, but dish it out via affiliates as "rewards." Non-monetary perks like loyalty points or referrals exploit gaps, qualifying as incentives rather than forbidden yields. DeFi integrations let holders farm tokens in liquidity pools, mimicking interest through fees shared indirectly. Staking protocols frame returns as "participation rewards," not interest, with tech seeding pools for their coin to dominate. Partnerships with exchanges offer backdoor yields on holdings, funded by ecosystem profits—banned directly? Sure, but affiliates skate free. Even credibly neutral collateral layers, like tokenized bank deposits, shift value accrual without direct payments. Tech generates revenue from transaction fees, lending, and institutional tie-ups, then funnels it back as subsidized perks. Regulators close one door? Tech builds a window, evading at Internet speed, while crushing margins to accelerate adoption.

Fortifying Moats: Network Effects That Lock Out Everyone Else

Once evasion secures the beachhead, tech layers on moats that prevent any foothold for competition. Aggregation strategies bundle stablecoins into broader ecosystems, strengthening network effects as users and businesses pile in. Preferential fees such as zero-cost fiat conversions or FX spreads, lock users in, while rivals pay premiums. Lower gas on partnered chains makes their coin the go-to for DeFi, amplifying liquidity flywheels. Rewards programs, akin to airline miles, reward volume with rebates or tokens, turning holders into loyalists. Exclusive merchant affiliations? Picture Amazon dubbing one stablecoin "official" for seamless perks, in swap for revenue shares—retailers like Walmart could adopt to slash costs, but only for the dominant player. Distribution wars heat up: wallets and apps embed exclusive tools, while compliance certifications create "trusted" moats for institutions. Profit-sharing with partners fosters symbiosis—everyone invests in growth, but only within that coin's network. As liquidity concentrates, spreads tighten, acceptance widens, and competitors fade. Smaller issuers? They lack the scale for subsidies or partnerships, getting aggregated out or just ignored. Tech's willing to nuke margins because the prize is total control: issuance moats via regulation, distribution via apps, and effects that make the ecosystem indispensable. And once the issuers own the market, they will swing their weight with lobbyists endorsing regulations that kill any upstarts in the cradle. Welcome to the real world.

Bottom Line: Tech's Margin Massacre Will Redefine Finance—Unless Banks Fight Back Smart!

This isn't disruption; it's domination. Tech's winner-takes-most ethos means they'll circumvent every rule, bleed margins dry, and erect moats that bury competition, all to own the $3.7 trillion stablecoin future. Banks can't lobby their way out—tech pivots too quickly. The path forward? Evolve the GENIUS Act to let banks lend against stablecoins, turning the tide with their credit superpower. Otherwise, watch deposits vanish, credit contract, and tech rewrite money's rules. Banks, your move—or get moated out.


Like what you see? Share it with your friends.
Mike Hogan

Mike Hogan

My team and I build amazing web & mobile apps for our companies and for our clients. With over $2B in value built among our various companies including an IPO and 3 acquisitions, we've turned company building into a science.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Updated with MPH

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest updates and promotions from MPH straight to your inbox.

This field is hidden when viewing the form
Name
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.